LAMOUR v. CROSBY et al
| ROBERT JOSEPH LAMOUR |
| ALLAN CROSBY, GARRETT RIPA, DAVID J VENTURELLA, MARKWAYNE MULLIN and TODD BLANCHE |
| 4:2026cv00563 |
| October 23, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| MARTIN A FITZPATRICK |
| T KENT WETHERELL |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 23, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by LENNARD B REGISTER, III on behalf of TODD BLANCHE, ALLAN CROSBY, MARKWAYNE MULLIN, GARRETT RIPA, DAVID J VENTURELLA (REGISTER, LENNARD) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Harun Taskin.( Filing fee $ 219 receipt number AFLNDC-10095843.) by ROBERT JOSEPH LAMOUR. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1) (TASKIN, HARUN) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number AFLNDC-10095817.), filed by ROBERT JOSEPH LAMOUR. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit 5, #7 Exhibit 6, #8 Exhibit 7, #9 Exhibit 8, #10 Exhibit 9) (TASKIN, HARUN) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK notified that action is needed Re: #2 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Harun Taskin.( Filing fee $ 219 receipt number AFLNDC-10095843.), #3 Notice of Appearance, #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus,. Referred to MARTIN A FITZPATRICK. (baf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.