O'NEAL v. ASTRUE
| MICHAEL O'NEAL |
| MICHAEL J ASTRUE |
| MICHAEL O'NEAL |
| 5:2008cv00332 |
| November 3, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW Office |
| Washington |
| RICHARD SMOAK |
| ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY |
| None |
| U.S. Government Plaintiff |
| 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
ORDER approved 34 Report and Recommendation. Pla's application for attys fees 31 is granted. Signed by JUDGE RICHARD SMOAK on 6/22/2010. (sea)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER ADOPTING 27 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION The Commissioner's decision is reversed. Pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g)the Commissioner is ordered to remand this case to the Administrative Law Judge for further proceedings consistent with the report and recommendation. Signed by JUDGE RICHARD SMOAK on 2/2/2010. (sea)
|
|
Filing
27
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that the decision of the Commissioner be REVERSED, that pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) the Commissioner be ordered to REMAND this case to the administrative law judge for further proc eedings consistent with this Report and Recommendation, and that the clerk be directed to CLOSE this file. R&R flag set. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY on 12/31/09. Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 1/28/2010. (lcu)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
