HIERRO v MCDONALD, et al
Plaintiff: MANUEL HIERRO
Defendant: CELESTE MCDONALD, PABIO LAMANGLOB, JANE DOE and THE COUNTY OF ORANGE
Case Number: 5:2009cv00068
Filed: March 6, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Office: Panama City Office
County: Jackson
Presiding Judge: ALLAN KORNBLUM
Presiding Judge: RICHARD SMOAK
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 22, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 131 ORDER ADOPTED 128 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION granted 107 Motion for Summary Judgment. The clerk is directed to enter final judgment in favor of Dfts Cherry and Tran & terminate them as parties to this suit. Signed by JUDGE RICHARD SMOAK on 9/22/2011. (sea)
January 12, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 118 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 117 MOTION for Reconsideration re 115 Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief filed by MANUEL HIERRO Response to motion for summary judgment due by by 2/14/2011; signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES on 1/12/11. (tss)
December 29, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 115 ORDER denying 113 Motion to Issue Subpoena for Purposes of Identifying Defendant Dr. Jane Doe signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES on 12/29/10. (tss)
September 14, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 106 ORDER denying 102 Motion to Amend/Correct Complaint Against County of Orange and denying 103 Motion Barring Defendnat Cherry from Filing a Second Motion for Summary Judgment; signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES on 9/14/10. (tss)
September 2, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 100 ORDER denied 93 Motion to Compel a response to the subpoena; granted 95 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Pla's Civil Rights Complaint. Signed by JUDGE RICHARD SMOAK on 9/2/2010. (sea)
September 1, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 99 ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER. Signed by Chief Judge Stephan P Mickle on 3/10/2010. (jws)
June 21, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 87 ORDER denied as moot 82 Motion For Clarification Of Order And Judgment. Pla's Motion For Trial And/Or Settlement Conference is denied. Signed by JUDGE RICHARD SMOAK on 6/21/2010. (sea)
June 2, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 76 ORDER vacated 73 Judgment. Signed by JUDGE RICHARD SMOAK on 6/2/2010. (sea)
May 28, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 72 ORDER Dft's 46 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED IN PART, insofar as Pla's claims against Dft Cherry for not adhering to the recommendation of Dr Olliff that Pla be prescribed and/or maintained on Crestor to manage his coronary artery disease. The motion is GRANTED IN ALL OTHER RESPECTS. This order shall be sent by certified copy to the Florida Department of Corrections, Office of General Counsel, 2601 Blair Stone Rd, Tallahassee, FL 32399-2500, for appropriate disciplinary sanctions. Signed by JUDGE RICHARD SMOAK on 5/28/2010. (sea)
March 30, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 66 ORDER denying 65 Motion to Compel. Signed by JUDGE RICHARD SMOAK on 3/30/2010. (jcw)
February 1, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 53 ORDER DEEMING MOOT 45 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by PABIO LAMANGLOB, GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 50 MOTION to Rename Defendants Jane Doe and Dr. Lomanglob filed by MANUEL HIERRO, GRANTING 48 MOTION to Extend Time filed by MANUEL HIERRO, and STRIKING 49 Amended Complaint filed by MANUEL HIERRO; signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ALLAN KORNBLUM on 2/1/10. (tss)
November 18, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ORDER GRANTING 40 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 1 Complaint (twenty-five) days filed by DANIEL CHERRY, CELESTE MCDONALD. CELESTE MCDONALD answer due 12/13/2009; DANIEL CHERRY answer due 12/13/2009. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ALLAN KORNBLUM on 11/18/2009. (jws)
June 23, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE re 1 Complaint filed by MANUEL HIERRO; signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ALLAN KORNBLUM on 6/23/09. (tss)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HIERRO v MCDONALD, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MANUEL HIERRO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CELESTE MCDONALD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PABIO LAMANGLOB
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JANE DOE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: THE COUNTY OF ORANGE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?