NIEBLA v. COPELAND

Plaintiff: JORGE L NIEBLA
Defendant: T COPELAND
Case Number: 5:2009cv00232
Filed: July 9, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Office: Panama City Office
County: Jackson
Presiding Judge: ALLAN KORNBLUM
Presiding Judge: RICHARD SMOAK
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 3, 2009 Filing 9 ORDER ADOPTING 7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - I find that Plaintiff has acted in bad faith in bringing this case and the other cases identified by the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. I request that the Departmen t of Corrections take appropriate disciplinary action against Plaintiff in accordance with §944.279(1), Florida Statutes. All complaints submitted by Plaintiff for filing must include on the front page in bold letters "IMMINENT DANGER OF SE RIOUS INJURY", supported by specific facts in the body of the complaint, and must be accompanied at that time by a motion to proceed in forma pauperis or by the full filing fee. If Plaintiff fails to comply with these requirements, the clerk sha ll return Plaintiff's papers without filing. If Plaintiff's future complaints do not support a finding of imminent danger of serious injury, additional disciplinary action will be sought against Plaintiff. The clerk is directed to close the file. Signed by JUDGE RICHARD SMOAK on 9/3/2009. (jcw)
August 21, 2009 Filing 7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 1 Complaint filed by JORGE L NIEBLA: It is recommended that all the cases be DISMISSED as frivolous. Plaintiff acted in bad faith in bringing these cases and a request that the institution where he i s incarcerated take appropriate disciplinary action. Any complaints submitted by Plaintiff must include on the front page in bold letters IMMINENT DANGER OF SERIOUS INJURY, and accompanied by a motion for IFP or the full filing fee, or the Clerk shal l return said papers without filing. If the complaint does not support a finding of imminent danger of serious injury, additional disciplinary action will be sought. R&R flag set. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ALLAN KORNBLUM on 8/21/2009. Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 9/18/2009. (jws)
August 18, 2009 Filing 5 ORDER ADOPTING 3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. This case is dismissed with prejudice. The clerk is directed to close the file. Signed by JUDGE RICHARD SMOAK on 8/18/2009. (jcw)
July 15, 2009 Filing 3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 1 Complaint filed by JORGE L NIEBLA : It is recommended that this case be DISMISSED with prejudice. R&R flag set. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ALLAN KORNBLUM on 7/15/2009. Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 8/12/2009. (kdm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: NIEBLA v. COPELAND
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JORGE L NIEBLA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: T COPELAND
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?