GAMMAL-LEVY, LLC. v. COASTAL COMMUNITY BANK et al
| GAMMAL-LEVY, LLC. |
| COASTAL COMMUNITY BANK, AMOS GOAZ, MICHAEL MALKA and YAIR ALON |
| 5:2009cv00334 |
| October 5, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| Panama City Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| MILES DAVIS |
| RICHARD SMOAK |
| None |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
97
ORDER re 95 Order is withdrawn. This case is dismissed with prejudice as to Deft Yair Alon. The clerk is directed to drop Dft Alon from the case. YAIR ALON terminated. Signed by JUDGE RICHARD SMOAK on 6/24/2010. (sea)
|
|
Filing
93
ORDER This case is dismissed from the active docket of the court. The clerk is directed to close the case file for administrative purposes, and upon the expiration of sixty (60) days w/o activity, the clerk is directed to close the case in its entirety for all purposes. Signed by JUDGE RICHARD SMOAK on 6/21/2010. (sea)
|
|
Filing
91
ORDER granted 88 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery. (Discovery due by 7/16/2010.) Signed by JUDGE RICHARD SMOAK on 6/11/2010. (sea)
|
|
Filing
10
OPINION filed re 5 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction MOTION to Dismiss for Improper Venue filed by COASTAL COMMUNITY BANK. Signed by Chief Judge Garrett E. Brown, Jr. on 9/28/2009. (mmh) [Transferred from New Jersey on 10/5/2009.]
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
