MOBLEY v. CCA CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA et al
| RAY CHRIS MOBLEY |
| CCA CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, BCSO FRANK MCKEITHEN, GREG PEEL and SAM DENHAM |
| 5:2009cv00342 |
| October 13, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| Panama City Office |
| Bay |
| M CASEY RODGERS |
| ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY |
| None |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
ORDER adopting 41 Report and Recommendation. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to comply with an order of the court and failure to prosecute. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on February 13, 2012. (pmc)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER denying without prejudice 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The clerk of court is directed to send Plaintiff a copy of the forms for non-prisoner pro se parties to request leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Within THIRTY (30) DAYS from the date of docketing of this order, Plaintiff shall pay the full $350.00 filing fee, or submit a motion to proceed in forma pauperis with a properly completed affidavit of financial status. (Fee or IFP motion due by 11/26/2009). Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY on 10/26/09. (lcu) IFP motion for non-prisoners mailed to Plaintiff
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
