PLANET BINGO LLC v. WILD BILL'S BINGO INC
Plaintiff: PLANET BINGO LLC
Defendant: WILD BILL'S BINGO INC
Case Number: 5:2010cv00064
Filed: March 23, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Office: Panama City Office
Presiding Judge: MILES DAVIS
Presiding Judge: RICHARD SMOAK
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 13, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 205 ORDER denying 189 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 190 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by JUDGE RICHARD SMOAK on 1/13/2015. (jcw)
February 24, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 70 ORDER Pla's Notice Re: Full Adjudication Of Parties Claims 69 . The clerk is directed to close the file. Signed by JUDGE RICHARD SMOAK on 2/24/2011. (sea)
January 31, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 68 ORDER that Count Two of Pla's Complaint is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by JUDGE RICHARD SMOAK on 1/31/2011. (sea)
January 18, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 65 ORDER Pla's Motion For Summary Judgment 48 as to Count I of the complaint is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of Pla & against Dft as to Count I of the Complaint in the principal amount of $682 ,907.00; attorneys' fees in the amount of $90,000; prejudgment interest at the annual rate of 18% upon the principal amount from September 14, 2009 until the date of the judgment; & post-judgment interest at the annual rate of 18% upon the principal amount from the date of this judgment until the principal amount is paid. Signed by JUDGE RICHARD SMOAK on 1/18/2011. (sea)
October 25, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 56 ORDER The case is dismissed from the active docket of the court. The clerk is directed to close the file of this case for administrative purposes, and upon the expiration of sixty days w/o activity, the clerk is direct to close the case in its entirety for all purposes. Signed by JUDGE RICHARD SMOAK on 10/25/2010. (sea)
September 13, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER denied 25 30 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by JUDGE RICHARD SMOAK on 9/13/2010. (sea)
August 12, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER Counter Dft's 25 Motion to Dismiss shall be converted into a motion for summary judgment. Pla shall file all material that is pertinent to whether summary judgment is appropriate not later than 8/27/2010. Deft shall file its response not later than 9/10/2010.Signed by JUDGE RICHARD SMOAK on 8/12/2010. (sea)
June 21, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER granted 11 MOTION to Dismiss Counterclaim. Dft is granted leave to amend its counterclaim by 7/6/2010. Signed by JUDGE RICHARD SMOAK on 6/21/2010. (sea)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: PLANET BINGO LLC v. WILD BILL'S BINGO INC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WILD BILL'S BINGO INC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: PLANET BINGO LLC
Represented By: KAREN JEANNE SEPURA FOUTS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?