KNIGHT v. ASTRUE
| TERRY M. KNIGHT |
| MICHAEL J ASTRUE |
| 5:2010cv00078 |
| April 14, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| Panama City Office |
| Bay |
| RICHARD SMOAK |
| ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY |
| Disability Insurance |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
ORDER approved 32 Report and Recommendation; granted 29 Petition for Attorney Fees; Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §2412 (EAJA), Pla is entitled to recover attorneys fees in the amount of $4,972.50 for time expended by Plas c ounsel in representing Pla before the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida. The amount of attorneys fees and hourly rates requested under the EAJA are reasonable, & the Commissioner is directed to pay Pla that amount. Signed by JUDGE RICHARD SMOAK on 2/18/2011. (sea)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER APPROVED 26 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Dfts Motion To Remand 25 is granted, & the Commissioners decision denying benefits is reversed. This case is remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. §405(g) for further proceedings. The clerk is directed to close the file. Signed by JUDGE RICHARD SMOAK on 1/6/2011. (sea)
|
|
Filing
26
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: 1. That Defendant's 25 MOTION to Reverse and Remand be GRANTED and the Commissioner's decision denying benefits be REVERSED. 2. That this case be REMANDED to the Commissioner of Social Secur ity pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings consistent with this Report and Recommendation. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY on 12/30/2010. R&R flag set. Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 1/27/2011. (djb)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER re 1 Complaint filed by TERRY M KNIGHT. - - 1. Pla's 8 Amended MOTION for Leave to Proceed IFP is Granted. - 2. Clerk shall forward to pla three blank USM forms. - 3. Pla shall submit completed USM forms within twen ty 20 days, along with three service copies of complaint. - 4. Upon receipt of the completed USM forms and copies of the complaint, the clerk of court is directed to issue the summonses and return them, along with the three certified copies of this order, the service copies of the complaint, and the prepared USM 285 forms to the USM. - - - (Service Copies & USM forms due by 5/17/2010. )- - - Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY on April 26, 2010.- - (USM 285 forms mailed to pla's counsel) (cbj)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: KNIGHT v. ASTRUE | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: TERRY M. KNIGHT | |
| Represented By: | DAVID E EVANS |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: MICHAEL J ASTRUE | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
