HOWARD v. FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION
Petitioner: TYRONE M HOWARD
Respondent: FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION
Case Number: 5:2010cv00182
Filed: July 6, 2010
Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Office: Panama City Office
County: Jackson
Presiding Judge: STEPHAN P MICKLE
Presiding Judge: ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 14, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER DENYING THE PETITION AND DENYING A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. ACCEPTING 14 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The clerk must enter judgment stating, The petition is DENIED with prejudice. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE on 7/14/12. (pll)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HOWARD v. FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: TYRONE M HOWARD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?