ALL POINTS CAPITAL CORP v. BOYD et al
| ALL POINTS CAPITAL CORP |
| JAMES A BOYD, BOYD BROTHERS INC and JAMES A BOYD, JR |
| 5:2011cv00116 |
| April 25, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| Panama City Office |
| Bay |
| RICHARD SMOAK |
| ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY |
| Negotiable Instrument |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
58
ORDER granting 47 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by JUDGE RICHARD SMOAK on 10/21/2011. (jcw)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER re 36 Stipulation Withdrawing Jury Trial Demand & Motion to Strike. The Motion to Strike 18 is Denied as moot. The jury demand is withdrawn, & this case will proceed as a bench trial. The hearing scheduled for August 16, 2011 is cancelled as to Pla ALL POINTS CAPITAL CORP. Signed by JUDGE RICHARD SMOAK on 8/10/2011. (sea)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER granting in part & denying in part 15 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by JUDGE RICHARD SMOAK on 7/15/2011. (sea)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER denied w/o prejudice 18 Motion to Strike Demand for Jury Trial. Signed by JUDGE RICHARD SMOAK on 7/7/2011. (sea)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER The relief requested by Pla's Unopposed Motion For An Order Sealing FourExhibits Attached To The Complaint & For Permission To File Substitute Redacted Exhibits 19 is granted. Signed by JUDGE RICHARD SMOAK on 6/21/2011. (sea)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
