BROWN v. AUGUSTINE
Petitioner: THEODORE BROWN
Respondent: PAIGE AUGUSTINE
Case Number: 5:2011cv00122
Filed: April 28, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Office: Panama City Office
County: Jackson
Presiding Judge: RICHARD SMOAK
Presiding Judge: ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 15, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER ADOPTING 19 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Petitioner's motion to amend petition (Doc. 18 ) is GRANTED. The petition for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Doc. 1 ) is DENIED and DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by JUDGE RICHARD SMOAK on 5/15/2012. (jcw)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BROWN v. AUGUSTINE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: THEODORE BROWN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: PAIGE AUGUSTINE
Represented By: MICHAEL JAY HARWIN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?