BREHM v. UNITED STATES
Plaintiff: ROBERT BREHM
Defendant: UNITED STATES
Case Number: 5:2011cv00246
Filed: July 19, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Office: Panama City Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: MAURICE M PAUL
Presiding Judge: ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY
Nature of Suit: Mandamus and Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 9, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER ADOPTING 16 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Case is DISMISSED for failure to follow orders of the Court, and Clerk directed to close the file. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 1/9/2012. (jws)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BREHM v. UNITED STATES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ROBERT BREHM
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNITED STATES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?