ROHN v. WYNDHAM VACATION RESORTS INC
Plaintiff: JIMMY L ROHN
Defendant: WYNDHAM VACATION RESORTS INC
Case Number: 5:2012cv00139
Filed: May 9, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Office: Panama City Office
County: Walton
Presiding Judge: RICHARD SMOAK
Presiding Judge: ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 621
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 13, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 89 ORDER granting 55 Motion for Summary Judgment. All pending motions are DENIED as moot. The Clerk is directed to close the case. Signed by JUDGE RICHARD SMOAK on 2/13/2013. (jcw)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ROHN v. WYNDHAM VACATION RESORTS INC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WYNDHAM VACATION RESORTS INC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JIMMY L ROHN
Represented By: RICHARD DEAN BARLOW
Represented By: MICHAEL THOMAS HARPER
Represented By: BRADLEY SYFRETT ODOM
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?