SCHMIDT v. TUCKER
Petitioner: DAN SCHMIDT
Respondent: PAM BONDI, KENNETH S TUCKER and MONICA DAVID
Case Number: 5:2012cv00226
Filed: July 18, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Office: Panama City Office
County: Bay
Presiding Judge: MAURICE M PAUL
Presiding Judge: ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 22, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 103 ORDER ADOPTING 98 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Respondent's [23, 35 motions to dismiss are DENIED. 57 Amended Petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE MAURICE M PAUL on 4/22/2013. (jws)
March 4, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 97 ORDER denying 87 , 91 Motions and overruling 92 , 92 Objections filed by Petitioner. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE MAURICE M PAUL on 3/4/2013. (jws)
January 29, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 86 ORDER re 83 Objection filed by DAN SCHMIDT is OVERRULED, and 75 Order on Motion to Disqualify Counsel will not be RECONSIDERED. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE MAURICE M PAUL on 1/29/2013. (jws)
January 15, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 79 ORDER: 59 , 73 Orders are VACATED, and Magistrate Judge directed to issue an order on those issues which explains the reasons for denying petitioner's motions. If petitioner disagrees with that order, he must again file objections. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE MAURICE M PAUL on 1/15/2013. (jws)
October 31, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER denying 36 Motion for Order of release pending the resolution of petition. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE MAURICE M PAUL on 10/31/2012. (jws)
October 23, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER denying 26 Motion for Certificate of Appealability; denying 27 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE MAURICE M PAUL on 10/23/2012. (jws)
October 1, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER denying 21 Motion to Amend or Alter; denying 19 Motion to Assign Case to Available Judge in Tallahassee Division as undersigned is now available. Case is REMANDED to Magistrate Judge. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE MAURICE M PAUL on 10/1/2012. (jws)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SCHMIDT v. TUCKER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: PAM BONDI
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: KENNETH S TUCKER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: MONICA DAVID
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: DAN SCHMIDT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?