REIS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
| SAUL D REIS, JR |
| NEIL ROBINSON, THERESA LEWIS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CHARLES E SAMUELS, JR, SERO, PAIGE AUGUSTINE, R SOLIS, SIMONA COOKE and GRETCHEN RYLE |
| 5:2012cv00336 |
| October 15, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| Panama City Office |
| Jackson |
| MAURICE M PAUL |
| ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY |
| Prison Condition |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
50
ORDER ADOPTING 48 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: This action is DISMISSED for the failure to state a claim for relief, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). That the clerk be directed to enter judgment accordingly and close the file. This case counts as a strike under 28 U.S.C. §1915(g). Signed by SENIOR JUDGE MAURICE M PAUL on 11/21/2014. (jws)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER ADOPTING 20 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: 16 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order (titled "Injunction Motion") by SAUL D REIS, JR is DENIED. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE MAURICE M PAUL on 6/12/2013. (jws)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER re 21 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to 20 R&R filed by SAUL D REIS, JR is GRANTED. (Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 4/22/2013.). Signed by SENIOR JUDGE MAURICE M PAUL on 2/25/2013. (jws)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
