WHITCOMB v. CITY OF PANAMA CITY et al
RONALD WHITCOMB |
SCOTT TEEPLE, CHRIS TAYLOR, MARK AVILES, CITY OF PANAMA CITY, FRANK MCKEITHEN and JEFFREY BECKER |
5:2013cv00030 |
January 17, 2013 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
Panama City Office |
Bay |
RICHARD SMOAK |
ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 179 ORDER granting 117 Motion for Summary Judgment. The claims against Defendant City are DISMISSED with prejudice. Because all the claims in this case have been dismissed with prejudice, the Clerk is directed to close this case. Signed by JUDGE RICHARD SMOAK on 1/3/2014. (jem) |
Filing 178 ORDER granting in part 121 Motion for Summary Judgment. The claims against Defendant Aviles are DISMISSED with prejudice. However, Defendant Aviles request for reasonable fees and costs is DENIED. Signed by JUDGE RICHARD SMOAK on 1/2/2014. (jem) |
Filing 177 ORDER granting in part 113 Motion for Summary Judgment. The claims against Defendant Taylor are DISMISSED with prejudice. Additionally, Defendant Taylors request for reasonable fees and costs is DENIED. Signed by JUDGE RICHARD SMOAK on 12/31/2013. (jem) |
Filing 175 ORDER granting 96 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 97 Motion for Summary Judgment. The claims against Defendant Teeple and Defendant McKeithen are DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by JUDGE RICHARD SMOAK on 12/30/2013. (jem) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.