WILKINS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Petitioner: WINSTON WILKINS
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Case Number: 5:2013cv00066
Filed: March 7, 2013
Court: Florida Northern District Court
Office: Panama City Office
County: Jackson
Presiding Judge: RICHARD SMOAK
Referring Judge: CHARLES J KAHN
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
April 19, 2013 6 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Construed as a motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, Petitioner's Motion (Doc. 1 ) is DISMISSED without prejudice and an unauthorized successive § 2255 motion. The clerk is directed to close the case. Signed by JUDGE RICHARD SMOAK on 4/19/2013. (jcw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: WILKINS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: WINSTON WILKINS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.