HARRIS v. CREWS et al
| LUIS MUNUZURI HARRIS |
| FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SAM CULPEPPER, FELICIA NOBLES, CHRIS LANDRUM, JEFFERY T BEASLEY and MICHAEL CREWS |
| 5:2013cv00203 |
| June 3, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| Panama City Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| GARY R JONES |
| MAURICE M PAUL |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
50
ORDER adopting 48 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; granting 36 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM; denying 49 Request for leave to file an amended complaint. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE MAURICE M PAUL on 8/27/2014. Conc erning Plaintiffs claim that he should be transferred to a prison closer to his pre-incarceration residence, this claim is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Pr ocedure 12(b)(6). As to all other claims brought by Plaintiff, this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to exhaust administrative remedies before filing suit, pursuant to the Prison Litigation Reform Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1997e. (kdm)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER ADOPTING 32 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Plaintiff's 31 Amended Motion for Preliminary Injunction is DENIED. This matter referred back to Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE MAURICE M PAUL on 12/30/2013. (jws)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
