MARTINEZ v SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Petitioner: RUBEN J MARTINEZ
Respondent: SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Case Number: 5:2015cv00140
Filed: June 18, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Office: Panama City Office
County: Bay
Presiding Judge: LACEY A COLLIER
Presiding Judge: GARY R JONES
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 24, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER ADOPTING 19 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE LACEY A COLLIER on 4/25/2018. (alb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MARTINEZ v SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: RUBEN J MARTINEZ
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?