GONZALEZ v. ARCHER et al
| GABRIEL GONZALEZ |
| KENDES ARCHER, CONNIE COPELAND, RYLES, PELT, KATIE WATSON, MELANIE ALEXANDER and ENGLISH |
| 5:2016cv00034 |
| February 5, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| Panama City Office |
| Jackson |
| LACEY A COLLIER |
| ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY |
| Prison Condition |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
54
ORDER adopting Chief Magistrate Judge's 49 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Plaintiff's Motion for Emergency Protective Order and Injunction (ECFNo. 47 ) is DENIED. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE LACEY A COLLIER on 12/28/2018. (MB)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER ADOPTING 10 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. This dismissal should be deemed a strike for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Signed by SENIOR JUDGE LACEY A COLLIER on 3/3/2017. (sdw)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER adopting Chief Magistrate Judge's 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. This dismissal should be deemed a strike for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Signed by SENIOR JUDGE LACEY A COLLIER on 01/11/2017. (MB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
