RUDD v. COLVIN
Plaintiff: SHARON RUDD
Defendant: CAROLYN W COLVIN
Case Number: 5:2016cv00325
Filed: December 1, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Office: Panama City Office
County: Bay
Presiding Judge: William Terrell Hodges
Presiding Judge: CHARLES J KAHN
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 206
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 27 MEMORANDUM ORDER - Decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED and plaintiff's applications for Disability Insurance Benefits and Supplemental Security Income are DENIED. Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of the Commissioner and close the file. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES J KAHN, JR on 01/19/2018. (MB)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: RUDD v. COLVIN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SHARON RUDD
Represented By: HEATHER FREEMAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CAROLYN W COLVIN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?