HERNANDEZ v. WARDEN
Petitioner: WALTER HERNANDEZ, SR
Respondent: WARDEN
Case Number: 5:2017cv00025
Filed: January 27, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Office: Panama City Office
County: Jackson
Presiding Judge: M CASEY RODGERS
Presiding Judge: CHARLES A STAMPELOS
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 23, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER adopting 18 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Respondent's motion to dismiss, ECF No. 11 , is GRANTED. Petition for writ of habeas corpus filed by Walter Hernandez, Sr., pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is DISMISSED. A certificate of appealability is DENIED and leave to appeal in forma pauperis is also DENIED. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 02/23/2018. (MB)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HERNANDEZ v. WARDEN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: WALTER HERNANDEZ, SR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: WARDEN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?