POPE v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Petitioner: TIMOTHY ARTHUR WAGNER POPE
Respondent: STATE OF FLORIDA
Case Number: 5:2017cv00086
Filed: March 17, 2017
Court: Florida Northern District Court
Office: Panama City Office
County: Bay
Presiding Judge: M CASEY RODGERS
Referring Judge: CHARLES A STAMPELOS
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
November 30, 2017 14 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER adopting Magistrate Judge's 13 Report and Recommendation. Respondent's motion to dismiss, ECF No. 12 , is GRANTED. The § 2254 petition for writ of habeas corpus, ECF No. 1 , is DISMISSED. A certificate of appealability is DENIED and leave to appeal in forma pauperis is also DENIED. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 11/30/2017. (MB)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: POPE v. STATE OF FLORIDA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: TIMOTHY ARTHUR WAGNER POPE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: STATE OF FLORIDA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?