HAMMAD v. HARGAN
Plaintiff: MUSTAFA A HAMMAD
Defendant: ERIC D HARGAN
Case Number: 5:2017cv00288
Filed: November 20, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Office: Panama City Office
County: Bay
Presiding Judge: ROBERT L HINKLE
Presiding Judge: GARY R JONES
Nature of Suit: Review or Appeal of Agency Decision
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 31, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER ON THE MERITS re adopting 32 Report and Recommendation.The decision of the Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services is affirmed. The clerk must enter judgment and close the file. Signed by JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE on 3/30/2021. (jcw)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HAMMAD v. HARGAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ERIC D HARGAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MUSTAFA A HAMMAD
Represented By: SEAN M ELLSWORTH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?