HATCHER v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
Plaintiff: ROYALE HATCHER
Defendant: FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, G BROCK, LAWRENCE, C MAJORANA, WILKINSON, MARK PICKETT and S RICE
Case Number: 5:2018cv00222
Filed: September 19, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: MICHAEL J FRANK
Referring Judge: M CASEY RODGERS
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 13, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER re #1 Complaint. The clerk of court shall forward to Plaintiff a civil rights complaint form for use by prisoners in actions filed under 42 U.S.C. 1983. This case number should be written on the form. Within THIRTY (30) DAYS from the date of docketing of this order, Plaintiff shall file an amended civil rights complaint in compliance with this order. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK on 11/13/2018.( Amended Pleadings due by 12/13/2018.)(Forms mailed as ordered.) (jcw)
October 29, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER GRANTING #5 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis to the extent that the case may proceed without prepayment of the entire filing fee. Directing Monthly Payments be made from Prison Account of ROYALE HATCHER. Fee status updated to in forma pauperis. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK on 10/29/18. **Letter and Order sent to DOC. (pll)
October 26, 2018 Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by ROYALE HATCHER. (alb)
October 26, 2018 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK notified that action is needed Re: #5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Referred to MICHAEL J FRANK. (alb)
September 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER entered re #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The clerk shall send Plaintiff a motion to proceed in forma pauperis and a prisoner consent form and financial certificate approved for use in the Northern District. This case number should be written on the forms. Within THIRTY (30) DAYS from the date of docketing of this order, Plaintiff shall (1) pay the filing fee of $400.00, or (2) submit a fully completed motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK on 9/27/2018. ( IFP/Fee due by 10/29/2018.)(Forms mailed as directed.) (jcw)
September 21, 2018 Filing 3 Notice to Pro Se (jcw)
September 21, 2018 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK notified that action is needed Re: #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #1 Complaint,. Referred to MICHAEL J FRANK. (jcw)
September 19, 2018 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by ROYALE HATCHER. (Prisoner consent attached but motion is missing) (jcw)
September 19, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against G BROCK, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, LAWRENCE, C MAJORANA, MARK PICKETT, S RICE, WILKINSON, filed by ROYALE HATCHER. (Filing fee was not paid; no service copies) (Attachments: #1 Appendix in Support of Complaint, #2 Proposed Order to Show Cause) (jcw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HATCHER v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: G BROCK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LAWRENCE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: C MAJORANA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WILKINSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MARK PICKETT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: S RICE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ROYALE HATCHER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?