JENNINGS v. JONES
Bryan Frederick Jennings and BRYAN FREDRICK JENNINGS |
JULIE L JONES |
5:2018cv00281 |
December 28, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
MICHAEL J FRANK |
ROBERT L HINKLE |
M CASEY RODGERS |
Death Penalty - Habeas Corpus |
28 U.S.C. § 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
|
ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE notified that action is needed Re: #4 Order Reassigning Case, see #2 MOTION for Leave to File re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - Death Penalty (djb) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF RELATED CASE by BRYAN FREDRICK JENNINGS (BACKHUS, TERRI) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS notified that action is needed Re: #3 Notice of Related Case (alb) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS notified that action is needed Re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - Death Penalty, #2 MOTION for Leave to File re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - Death Penalty Memorandum of Law (alb) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to File re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - Death Penalty Memorandum of Law by Bryan Frederick Jennings. (BACKHUS, TERRI) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Death Penalty) ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number AFLNDC-4366517.), filed by Bryan Frederick Jennings. (BACKHUS, TERRI) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.