RESTORE ROBOTICS LLC et al v. INTUITIVE SURGICAL INC
| RESTORE ROBOTICS LLC and RESTORE ROBOTICS REPAIR LLC |
| INTUITIVE SURGICAL INC |
| 5:2019cv00055 |
| February 27, 2019 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| MICHAEL J FRANK |
| M CASEY RODGERS |
| Anti-Trust |
| 15 U.S.C. § 2 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #10 Motion For Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Attorney Karen Lent, of the law firm of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, is admitted pro hac vice to represent Defendant, Intuitive Surgical, Inc., pursuant to Local Rule 11.1(C). (Appointed KAREN MARY LENT for INTUITIVE SURGICAL INC). Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 4/12/2019. (MB)
|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS notified that action is needed Re: #10 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Karen Lent.( Filing fee $ 201 receipt number AFLNDC-4455055.) (MB) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Karen Lent.( Filing fee $ 201 receipt number AFLNDC-4455055.) by INTUITIVE SURGICAL INC. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing) (LENT, KAREN) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #6 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Appointed ABRAHAM M ANDRADE, III for INTUITIVE SURGICAL INC). Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 3/26/2019. (djb)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #5 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Appointed ALLEN J RUBY for INTUITIVE SURGICAL INC). Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 3/26/2019. (djb)
|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS notified that action is needed Re: #6 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Abraham M. Andrade, #5 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Allen Ruby. (djb) |
| Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by RESTORE ROBOTICS LLC, RESTORE ROBOTICS REPAIR LLC. INTUITIVE SURGICAL INC waiver sent on 2/27/2019, answer due 4/29/2019. (BERHOLD, JEFFREY) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Abraham M. Andrade.( Filing fee $ 201 receipt number BFLNDC-4439415.) by INTUITIVE SURGICAL INC. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing) (ANDRADE, ABRAHAM) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Allen Ruby.( Filing fee $ 201 receipt number AFLNDC-4439405.) by INTUITIVE SURGICAL INC. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing) (RUBY, ALLEN) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER. Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs, ECF No. #3 , is GRANTED. Attorney Jeffrey L. Berhold, of the law firm of Jeffrey L. Berhold, P.C., is admitted pro hac vice to represent the Plaintiffs, pursuant to Local Rule 11.1(C). Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 2/28/2019. (MB)
|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS notified that action is needed Re: #1 Complaint, #3 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Jeffrey L. Berhold.( Filing fee $ 201 receipt number AFLNDC-4416261.) (MB) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Jeffrey L. Berhold.( Filing fee $ 201 receipt number AFLNDC-4416261.) by RESTORE ROBOTICS LLC, RESTORE ROBOTICS REPAIR LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing) (BERHOLD, JEFFREY) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (BERHOLD, JEFFREY) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against INTUITIVE SURGICAL INC ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number AFLNDC-4416237.), filed by RESTORE ROBOTICS LLC, RESTORE ROBOTICS REPAIR LLC. (BERHOLD, JEFFREY) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
