MOORE v. INCH
| RICHARD B MOORE |
| MARK INCH |
| 5:2020cv00057 |
| February 14, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| MICHAEL J FRANK |
| ROGER VINSON |
| Prisoner Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER granting in part and denying in part #5 MOTION FOR REHEARING/RECONSIDERATION. Plaintiff must pay the initial partial filing fee of $8.33 on or before April 23, 2020. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK on 4/9/2020. (jcw)
|
| Set Deadlines/Hearings Fee due by 4/23/2020. (jcw) |
| Filing 5 MOTION FOR REHEARING/RECONSIDERATION re #4 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by RICHARD B MOORE. (jcw) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK notified that action is needed Re: #5 MOTION FOR REHEARING/RECONSIDERATION re #4 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis,,,,. Referred to MICHAEL J FRANK. (jcw) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and Directing Monthly Payments be made from Prison Account of RICHARD B. MOORE. The clerk of the court shall assess Plaintiff $8.33 as an initial partial filing fee as provided in 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1)(A). On or before 4/13/2020, Plaintiff shall submit the initial partial filing fee as assessed by the clerk of the court. Fee status updated to in forma pauperis. The clerk of court is directed to MAIL a copy of this order, with the appropriate cover letter to: Department of Corrections, 501 South Calhoun St., Tallahassee, FL 32399-2500, Attention: Agency Clerk. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the clerk of court shall forward to Plaintiff a form for consenting to have a United States Magistrate Judge exercise civil jurisdiction, with the case number written on it. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J. FRANK on 3/12/2020. (jcw)(cc: DOC as directed)(Form mailed as ordered.)
|
| Filing 3 Notice to Pro Se (jcw) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by RICHARD B MOORE. (Attachments: #1 CONSENT FORM AND FINANCIAL CERTIFICATE) (blb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MARK INCH, filed by RICHARD B MOORE. (blb)*no fee paid, 2 copies provided* |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK notified that action is needed Re: #1 Complaint, #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Referred to MICHAEL J FRANK. (jcw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: MOORE v. INCH | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: MARK INCH | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: RICHARD B MOORE | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
