FORD v. SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
| JUSTIN FORD |
| SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PESIBY, LEWIS, PABIS and JAMES GILL |
| 5:2020cv00201 |
| July 24, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY |
| T KENT WETHERELL |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i). The clerk is directed to modify the docket to reflect Petitioner's current address as indicated in his Motion to Strike (ECF No. #8 ). The clerk is directed to then close this case. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY on 08/21/2020. (alb)
|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY notified that action is needed Re: #8 MOTION to Strike #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Referred to ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY. (alb) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Strike #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, by JUSTIN FORD. (alb) (alb). |
|
Filing 7
ORDER of deficiency. Petitioner's Motion to Compel, received by the clerk of the court on August 13, 2020, was referred to the undersigned with deficiencies. The clerk is directed to RETURN the document without filing. Petitioner may re- submit it after correcting the above-noted deficiency. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY on 08/14/2020. (alb)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE to Court, by JUSTIN FORD (alb) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER denying without prejudice #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The clerk of court is directed to send Petitioner a petition form for use in Section 2254 cases and the court-approved IFP forms. Additionally, the clerk is directed to modify the docket to reflect that Mark S. Inch, Secretary of the FDOC, is the sole Respondent in this case. If Petitioner wishes to proceed with this habeas action, he must (1) file a 2254 petition on the form provided by the clerk, and (2) either pay the $5.00 filing fee or submit a complete IFP motion with the required supporting documentation. (IFP motion/Filing Fee/Habeas Petition due by 9/9/2020.) Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY on 08/10/2020. (forms to Pet) (sdw)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by JUSTIN FORD. (alb) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY notified that action is needed Re: #4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Referred to ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY. (alb) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER. The clerk is directed to send Petitioner a motion to proceed in forma pauperis and a prisoner consent form and financial certificate approved for use in the Northern District. Within thirty days of the date of this order, Petitioner must either pay the filing fee of $5.00, or file a fully completed motion to proceed in forma pauperis( Fee due by 8/31/2020.) (Order and form mailed.) Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY on 7/30/2020. (alb)
|
| Filing 2 Notice to Pro Se Litigant. (alb) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY notified that action is needed Re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (alb) |
| Filing 1 Emergency PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by JUSTIN FORD. (No service copies, IFP motion or fee.) (alb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
