FLOREZ v. EASTERN SHIPBUILDING GROUP INC
DANIEL FLOREZ |
EASTERN SHIPBUILDING GROUP, INC and EASTERN SHIPBUILDING GROUP INC |
5:2020cv00210 |
August 7, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
MICHAEL J FRANK |
ROBERT L HINKLE |
Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
29 U.S.C. ยง 2601 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 CLERK'S JUDGMENT re #13 Order Dismissing Case. (jcw) |
Filing 13 ORDER FOR DISMISSAL. The parties must comply with their settlement agreement. All claims other than for enforcement of the settlement agreement are voluntarily dismissed with prejudice. Jurisdiction is retained to enforce the order to comply with the settlement agreement. The clerk must enter judgment stating, "The parties are ordered to comply with their settlement agreement. All claims in this case are voluntarily dismissed with prejudice. The court reserves jurisdiction to enforce the order to comply with the settlement agreement." The clerk must close the file. Signed by JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE on 9/29/2020. (jcw) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Settlement (Joint) by EASTERN SHIPBUILDING GROUP INC (WHITE, B) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE notified that action is needed Re: #5 Initial Scheduling Order - Rule 26 Meeting Report was not filed. (jcw) |
Filing 11 Corporate Disclosure Statement/Certificate of Interested Persons by EASTERN SHIPBUILDING GROUP INC. (WHITE, B) |
Filing 10 NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT re #7 MOTION for Default Judgment as to Defendant by DANIEL FLOREZ (LEE, KYLE) Modified on 8/13/2020 to correct title (jcw). |
Filing 9 RESPONSE to Motion re #7 MOTION for Default Judgment as to Defendant filed by EASTERN SHIPBUILDING GROUP INC. (WHITE, B) |
Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint by EASTERN SHIPBUILDING GROUP INC. (WHITE, B) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Default Judgment as to Defendant by DANIEL FLOREZ. (Internal deadline for referral to judge if response not filed earlier: 8/26/2020). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Return of Service Executed) (LEE, KYLE) |
Filing 6 ORDER ON RULE 26(f) OBLIGATIONS. Signed by JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE on 8/11/2020. (jcw) |
Filing 5 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER - Fed.R.Civ.P. 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set for 8/25/2020. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 9/25/2020. Discovery due by 3/8/2021. Jury Trial set for 6/21/2021 08:15 AM in U.S. Courthouse Tallahassee before JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE. Signed by JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE on 8/11/2020. (jcw) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by MARY MEGAN COUGHLIN on behalf of EASTERN SHIPBUILDING GROUP INC (COUGHLIN, MARY) |
Filing 3 DOCKET ANNOTATION BY COURT TO ALL COUNSEL: Counsel is advised that for all future pleadings, for this case and any future cases assigned to Judge Hinkle, any exhibit attached to a document filing should be properly identified. (Example: Deposition of John Doe rather than Exhibit A.) (jcw) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE notified that action is needed Re: #1 Notice of Removal - An ISO is needed. (jcw) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (WHITE, B) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by EASTERN SHIPBUILDING GROUP, INC from FOURTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, BAY COUNTY, FL, case number 20001058CA. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number AFLNDC-5569219.), filed by EASTERN SHIPBUILDING GROUP, INC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A) (WHITE, B) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.