RAMSEY v. INCH
Petitioner: BRANDON TERRELL RAMSEY
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT and MARK S INCH
Case Number: 5:2020cv00302
Filed: November 9, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY
Referring Judge: T KENT WETHERELL
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 7, 2021 Filing 6 Habeas Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number FLN300014285. Fee status updated to paid. (alb)
January 7, 2021 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY notified that action is needed Re: 6 Habeas Filing Fee Received. (alb)
December 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER. The clerk is directed to modify the docket to reflect that Mark S. Inch is the sole Respondent. Petitioner's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. #4 ) is DENIED. Petitioner must pay the $5.00 filing fee to the clerk of court within thirty days of the date of this order.( Fee due by 1/15/2021.) Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY on 12/15/2020. (alb)
December 14, 2020 Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, by BRANDON TERRELL RAMSEY. (alb)
December 14, 2020 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY notified that action is needed Re: #4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Referred to ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY. (alb)
November 12, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER. The clerk of court is directed to send Petitioner a motion to proceed in forma pauperis and a prisoner consent form and financial certificate. Within thirty days of the date of this order, Petitioner must either pay the filing fee of $5.00, or file a fully completed motion to proceed in forma pauperis with the requisite prisoner consent form and financial certificate. (Filing Fee or IFP Motion due by 12/12/2020.) (Form mailed w/ORDER). Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY on 11/12/2020. (mb)
November 11, 2020 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY notified that action is needed Re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (No service copies/no IFP Motion/fee not paid). Referred to ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY. (mb)
November 9, 2020 Filing 2 Notice to Pro Se Litigant, BRANDON TERRELL RAMSEY. (mb)
November 9, 2020 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by BRANDON TERRELL RAMSEY. (No service copies/no IFP Motion/fee not paid). (mb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: RAMSEY v. INCH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: BRANDON TERRELL RAMSEY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: MARK S INCH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?