JOHNSON v. INCH
| ELBERT JOHNSON |
| MARK INCH |
| 5:2021cv00154 |
| July 27, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| MICHAEL J FRANK |
| T KENT WETHERELL |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed re #7 as to MARK S INCH. (jcw) |
| Filing 9 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed re #7 as to Attorney General. (jcw) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Change of Address by ELBERT JOHNSON. (Address updated to WAKULLA CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, 110 MELALEUCA DR, CRAWFORDVILLE, FL 32327) (jcw) |
Filing 7
ORDER denying #5 Motion for Extension of Time; denying #6 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk of Court shall furnish a copy of the petition (including exhibits) and this order to Respondent and the Attorney General of the State of Florida. Within FORTY-FIVE (45) DAYS (10/18/2021), Respondent shall file a limited response as directed by this order.. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK on 9/1/2021. (jcw)(cc: Respondent, Attorney General).
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel by ELBERT JOHNSON. (jcw) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time re #4 Order to Show Cause by ELBERT JOHNSON. (jcw) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK notified that action is needed Re: #6 MOTION to Appoint Counsel, #5 MOTION for Extension of Time. Referred to MICHAEL J FRANK. (jcw) |
|
Filing 4
SHOW CAUSE ORDER re #1 Petitioner for Writ of Habeas Corpus. On or before 8/24/2021, Petitioner shall show cause why his 2254 petition should not be dismissed as an unauthorized "second or successive" habeas corpus application. Petitioner's response to this order must be accompanied by a copy of the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals order authorizing him to file a second or successive 2254 petition. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK on 8/2/2021. (jcw)
|
| Filing 3 Notice to Pro Se (jcw) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK notified that action is needed Re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Referred to MICHAEL J FRANK. (jcw) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by ELBERT JOHNSON. (jcw) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by ELBERT JOHNSON. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits)(Filing fee was not paid.)(2 non-identical service copies filed: various exhibit pages missing) (jcw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: JOHNSON v. INCH | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: ELBERT JOHNSON | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: MARK INCH | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
