OSWALT v. SALFITY et al
Plaintiff: Floyd Oswalt
Defendant: Alex Salfity and Mathiew Salfity
Case Number: 5:2021cv00183
Filed: September 13, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: MICHAEL J FRANK
Referring Judge: T KENT WETHERELL
Nature of Suit: Marine
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER OF DISMISSAL - Based on Plaintiff's notice of voluntary dismissal without prejudice (Doc. #9 ), it is ORDERED that this case is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), and the Clerk shall close the case file. Signed by JUDGE T KENT WETHERELL II on 10/4/2021. (jcw)
October 1, 2021 Filing 10 NOTICE OF CLOSED BANKRUPTCY CASE AS TO ALEX SALFITY by FLOYD OSWALT (Attachments: #1 Exhibit DISCHARGE OF DEBTORS WITH ORDER APROVING TRUSTEE'S REPORT OF NO DISTRIBUTION, CLOSING ESTATE AND DISCHARGING TRUSTEE) (BRUNER, VINCENT)
October 1, 2021 Filing 9 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by FLOYD OSWALT (BRUNER, VINCENT)
October 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER PARTIALLY DISMISSING AND STAYING CASE - This case is dismissed with prejudice as to Defendant Matthew Salfity pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), and the Clerk shall terminate him as a defendant in CM/ECF. Defendant Matthew Salfity's motion to dismiss (Doc. #2 ) is DENIED as moot. This case is stayed pending disposition of the bankruptcy proceeding against Defendant Alex Salfity or notice from the parties that the automatic stay has been lifted. See 11 U.S.C. 362. The parties shall file status reports every 90 days, with the first report due on 1/3/2022. Signed by JUDGE T KENT WETHERELL II on 10/1/2021. (jcw)
October 1, 2021 ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE T KENT WETHERELL II notified that action is needed Re: #7 Stipulation of Dismissal (jcw)
September 30, 2021 Filing 7 STIPULATION of Dismissal WITH PREJUDICE AS TO DEFENDANT MATHIEW SALFITY ONLY by FLOYD OSWALT. (BRUNER, VINCENT)
September 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER re #2 MOTION to Dismiss. ORDERED that Plaintiff shall have 7 days from the date of this Order to respond to Defendant Matthew Salfity's motion to dismiss. No extensions of this deadline will be granted. (Response due by 10/7/2021.) Signed by JUDGE T KENT WETHERELL II on 9/30/2021. (jcw)
September 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER : Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 11/12/2021. Discovery due by 1/27/2022. Signed by JUDGE T KENT WETHERELL II on 9/29/2021. (jcw)
September 29, 2021 ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE T KENT WETHERELL II notified that action is needed Re: #2 MOTION to Dismiss - No response filed. (jcw)
September 15, 2021 Set/Reset Deadline - Clerk to check status of #4 Attorney admission on 10/14/2021. (jcw)
September 14, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE REGARDING ADMISSION TO PRACTICE as to VINCENT M. BRUNER, ESQ. on behalf of FLOYD OSWALT. (jcw)
September 14, 2021 Filing 3 DOCKET ANNOTATION BY COURT: The parties in the above-referenced case were added to the docket incorrectly and will be corrected by the clerk. Party names are to be entered in all caps and without punctuation. For future reference, please review the procedure for adding/creating new parties in the "Style Guide for Electronic Case Filing" and/or chapter 10 of the "CM/ECF Attorney User's Guide," available at www.flnd.uscourts.gov. (jcw)
September 13, 2021 Filing 2 MOTION to Dismiss by Alex Salfity, Mathiew Salfity. (Internal deadline for referral to judge if response not filed earlier: 9/27/2021). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exh. A - M. Salfity Declaration, #2 Exhibit Exh. B - A. Salfity Declaration) (THIEL, ERIC)
September 13, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Mathiew Salfity, Alex Salfity from In the Circuit Court of the 14th Judicial Circuit, in and for Bay County, State of Florida, case number 21001017CA. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AFLNDC-6306080.), filed by Mathiew Salfity, Alex Salfity. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Defendant Mathiew Salfity's Notice of Removal, #2 Exhibit Exh. A - State Court Case, #3 Exhibit Exh. B - M. Salfity's Declaration, #4 Exhibit Exh. C - A. Salfity's Declaration, #5 Exhibit Exh. D - Demand Letter 051421, #6 Exhibit Exh. E - Consent to Removal) (THIEL, ERIC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: OSWALT v. SALFITY et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Floyd Oswalt
Represented By: VINCENT MAXWELL BRUNER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alex Salfity
Represented By: ERIC C THIEL
Represented By: MADISON WRIGHT BREDER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mathiew Salfity
Represented By: ERIC C THIEL
Represented By: MADISON WRIGHT BREDER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?