SCHOOLEY v. OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION
GLEN SCHOOLEY |
OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION and SAND CANYON CORPORATION |
5:2021cv00219 |
November 17, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
MICHAEL J FRANK |
ALLEN C WINSOR |
Negotiable Instrument |
15 U.S.C. ยง 77 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT against OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION, filed by GLEN SCHOOLEY. (No service copies filed.) (jcw) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK notified that action is needed Re: #11 Amended Complaint. (jcw) |
Filing 10 ORDER - The clerk of the court shall strike Plaintiff's first amended complaint. Doc. #9 . On or before 1/13/2022, Plaintiff shall: a. file a notice of voluntary dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1)(A); or b. file an amended complaint in compliance with this order, which shall be typed or clearly written and marked as Plaintiff's "Second Amended Complaint." Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK on 12/14/2021. (jcw) |
Filing 9 ***STRICKEN PER #10 ORDER*** FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION, filed by GLEN SCHOOLEY. (Service copies were not received) (sjb) Modified on 12/14/2021 (jcw). |
ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK notified that action is needed Re: #9 Amended Complaint. (sjb) |
Filing 8 ORDER - The clerk of the court shall strike Plaintiff's complaint. Doc. #1 . On or before 1/3/2022, Plaintiff shall: a. file a notice of voluntary dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1)(A); or b. file an amended complaint in compliance with this order, which shall be typed or clearly written and marked as Plaintiff's "Amended Complaint." Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK on 12/2/2021. (jcw) |
Filing 7 Filing fee: $ 402.00, receipt number FLN300015026. Fee status updated to paid. (jfj) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK notified that action is needed Re: #7 Filing Fee Received. (jcw) |
Filing 6 ORDER denying without prejudice #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. On or before 12/10/2021, Plaintiff shall: a. pay the $402.00 fee; or b. submit a fully-completed motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis for non-prisoners, using the Northern District of Florida form, which can be found at http://www.flnd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/forms/IFP-motion-NonPrisoner.pdf, and include a properly-completed affidavit of financial status. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK on 11/19/2021. (jcw) |
Filing 5 ORDER entered #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff shall not serve upon Defendant the summons and a copy of the complaint unless and until directed to do so by this court. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK on 11/19/2021. (jcw) |
Filing 4 Notice to Pro Se Litigant. (alb) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK notified that action is needed Re: #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #1 Complaint. Referred to MICHAEL J FRANK. (alb) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION. (summons signed and returned to plaintiff.) (alb) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by GLEN SCHOOLEY. (alb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION, filed by GLEN SCHOOLEY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits Supporting Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (alb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.