PATRICK v. FORSTER AND HOWELL INCORPORATED
| FRANKLIN PATRICK, JR. and FRANKLIN PATRICK, JR |
| FORSTER AND HOWELL, INCORPORATED and FORSTER AND HOWELL INCORPORATED doing business as GROCERY OUTLET |
| 5:2022cv00020 |
| January 25, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| MICHAEL J FRANK |
| MARK E WALKER |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER FOR EXPEDITED RESPONSE re #14 MOTION to Compel. The Plaintiff shall file an expedited response to the motion on or before Thursday, 3/31/2022. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 3/24/2022. (jcw)
|
| Filing 14 MOTION to Compel by FORSTER AND HOWELL INCORPORATED. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. A - Letter to Plaintiff - Meet and Confer Plaintiff's Rule 26(a)(1) Disclosures, #2 Exhibit Ex. B - Disclosures - Plaintiff's Rule 26(a)(1) Initial Disclosures - Document 13, #3 Exhibit Ex. C - Disclosures - Plaintiff's Amended Rule 26(a)(1) Initial Disclosures) (MILLER, DOUGLAS) |
| Filing 13 RULE 26 Disclosures by FRANKLIN PATRICK, JR. (BLAIS, NICOLE) |
| Filing 12 RULE 26 Disclosures by FORSTER AND HOWELL INCORPORATED. (MILLER, DOUGLAS) |
| Set Deadlines/Hearings Status Report due by 3/28/2022. (jcw) |
| Filing 11 STATUS REPORT by FRANKLIN PATRICK, JR. (BLAIS, NICOLE) |
|
Filing 10
SCHEDULING AND MEDIATION ORDER re: #8 Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting: (Discovery due by 12/30/2022., Dispositive Motions to be filed by 1/20/2023., Jury Trial set for 4/17/2023 at 8:15 AM in U.S. Courthouse Tallahassee before CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER., Mediation Report due by 2/10/2023.), Case referred to mediation. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 2/25/2022. (jcw)
|
| Filing 9 STATUS REPORT by FORSTER AND HOWELL INCORPORATED. (MILLER, DOUGLAS) |
| Filing 8 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (MILLER, DOUGLAS) |
| Filing 7 SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE in Opposition re #3 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by FRANKLIN PATRICK, JR. (BLAIS, NICOLE) Modified on 2/10/2022 to edit title (jcw). |
| Filing 6 RESPONSE in Opposition re #3 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by FRANKLIN PATRICK, JR. (BLAIS, NICOLE) |
| Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement/Certificate of Interested Persons by FORSTER AND HOWELL INCORPORATED. (MILLER, DOUGLAS) |
|
Filing 4
INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Fed.R.Civ.P. 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set for 2/9/2022. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 3/11/2022. Discovery due by 5/26/2022. Status Report due by 2/25/2022. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 1/26/2022. (jcw)
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines as to #3 MOTION TO DISMISS. (Internal deadline for referral to judge if response not filed earlier: 2/8/2022). (jcw) |
| Filing 3 MOTION TO DISMISS AND/OR STRIKE PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT by FORSTER AND HOWELL, INCORPORATED. (Attachments: #1 Ex. A - Amended Complaint) (MILLER, DOUGLAS) Modified on 1/26/2022 to edit title (jcw). |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (MILLER, DOUGLAS) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by FORSTER AND HOWELL, INCORPORATED from CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, BAY COUNTY, FLORIDA, case number 2021-CA-001375. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AFLNDC-6643128.), filed by FORSTER AND HOWELL, INCORPORATED. (Attachments: #1 Ex. A - Summonses & Complaints, #2 Ex. B - Defendant's Notice of Filing its Notice of Removal, #3 Ex. C - Demand Letter) (MILLER, DOUGLAS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
