CREAMER v. FORD et al
SEAN LEE CREAMER |
TOMMY FORD, JEFFERY BENNETT, DAVID HIGGINS, JR, WILLIAM HOLTON ADAMS, CHANDLER COLVIN, CHASE HALE, DARRELL CHASE NORRIS and THOMAS LAROCHE |
5:2023cv00139 |
May 18, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
MICHAEL J FRANK |
T KENT WETHERELL |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ORDER - On or before 7/24/2023, Plaintiff shall explain and show cause why he failed to comply with this court's order. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK on 7/10/2023. (jcw) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK notified that action is needed Re: #6 Order - No response filed. (jcw) |
Filing 6 ORDER denying without prejudice #5 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The clerk of the court shall send Plaintiff a new motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis for use by prisoners and a Prisoner Consent Form and Financial Certificate approved for use in the Northern District of Florida. On or before 6/22/2023, Plaintiff shall: a. pay the $402.00 filing fee to the clerk of the court; or b. submit a fully-completed motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis with the requisite Prisoner Consent Form and Financial Certificate signed by a jail official and an attached printout of the transactions in Plaintiff's inmate trust account, or the institutional equivalent, during the six-month period of incarceration preceding the filing of this suit. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK on 6/8/2023. (jcw)(Form sent as ordered.) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by SEAN LEE CREAMER. (jcw) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK notified that action is needed Re: #5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Referred to MICHAEL J FRANK. (jcw) |
Filing 4 ORDER denying without prejudice #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The clerk of the court shall send Plaintiff a new motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis for use by prisoners and a Prisoner Consent Form and Financial Certificate approved for use in the Northern District of Florida. On or before 6/6/2023, Plaintiff shall: a. pay the $402.00 filing fee to the clerk of the court; or b. submit a fully-completed motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis with the requisite Prisoner Consent Form and Financial Certificate signed by a jail official and an attached printout of the transactions in Plaintiff's inmate trust account, or the institutional equivalent, during the six-month period of incarceration preceding the filing of this suit. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK on 5/23/2023. (jcw)(Form sent as ordered.) |
Filing 3 Notice to Pro Se (jcw) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK notified that action is needed Re: #1 Complaint, #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Referred to MICHAEL J FRANK. (jcw) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by SEAN LEE CREAMER. (jcw) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against WILLIAM HOLTON ADAMS, JEFFERY BENNETT, CHANDLER COLVIN, TOMMY FORD, CHASE HALE, DAVID HIGGINS, JR, THOMAS LAROCHE, DARRELL CHASE NORRIS, filed by SEAN LEE CREAMER. (Pages are missing. Complaint is not signed. Filing fee was not paid. No service copies filed.) (jcw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.