RAFFIELD v. HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE MIDWEST
| DANNY RAFFIELD |
| HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE MIDWEST |
| 5:2023cv00245 |
| September 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| MICHAEL J FRANK |
| MARK E WALKER |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
SCHEDULING AND MEDIATION ORDER : Discovery due by 4/12/2024. Dispositive Motions to be filed by 5/3/2024. Amended Pleadings due by 12/11/2023. The jury trial is set for the trial period that begins on Monday, 9/16/2024. Mediation Report due by 5/24/2024. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 10/30/2023. (baf)
|
| Filing 8 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (BURKE, SARAH) |
| Set Deadlines re #4 Initial Scheduling Order - Status Report due by 11/15/2023. (jcw) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint by HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE MIDWEST. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certified Policy) (FERNANDEZ, VINCENT) |
| Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement/Certificate of Interested Persons by HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE MIDWEST identifying Corporate Parent THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP INC for HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE MIDWEST.. (FERNANDEZ, VINCENT) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by CANDICE ROJAS-COLUCCI on behalf of DANNY RAFFIELD (ROJAS-COLUCCI, CANDICE) |
|
Filing 4
INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Fed.R.Civ.P. 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set for 9/29/2023. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 10/30/2023. Discovery due by 1/16/2024. Status Report due by 10/16/2023. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 9/15/2023. (jcw)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by VINCENT A FERNANDEZ on behalf of HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE MIDWEST (FERNANDEZ, VINCENT) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (FERNANDEZ, VINCENT) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE MIDWEST from Fourteenth Judicial Circuit in and for Gulf County, case number 23-CA-56. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AFLNDC-8169323.), filed by HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE MIDWEST. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court Documents (Ex. 1), #2 Exhibit Plaintiff's Estimate (Ex. 2), #3 Exhibit Domicile Documents for Carl Raffield(Ex. 3), #4 Exhibit Domicile Documents for Danny Raffield) (FERNANDEZ, VINCENT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: RAFFIELD v. HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE MIDWEST | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: DANNY RAFFIELD | |
| Represented By: | CANDICE ROJAS-COLUCCI |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE MIDWEST | |
| Represented By: | VINCENT A FERNANDEZ |
| Represented By: | SARAH RUTH BURKE |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
