Millette v. DEK Technologies,Inc. et al
| Dolores Millette |
| Billie Tarnove, Webster Bank,N.A., Pablo Camus, Nadeau General Contractors,Inc., Steve Lambert, DEK Technologies,Inc., Robert Imperato and Steven Cummings |
| 0:2008cv60639 |
| April 30, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Ft. Lauderdale Office |
| Broward |
| James I. Cohn |
| Barry S. Seltzer |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
784
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 773 Defendant Billie Tarnove's Motion for Costs and Attorney Fees. Signed by Judge James I. Cohn on 8/8/2012. (npd)
|
|
Filing
702
ORDER denying 688 Defendant Nadeau General Contractor, Inc.'s Motion for Relief Pursuant to Rule 60(b) and/or Motion for Determination of Plaintiff's Damages. Signed by Judge James I. Cohn on 3/26/2012. (npd)
|
|
Filing
664
ORDER denying 649 Billie Tarnove's Renwed Rule 50 Motion. Signed by Judge James I. Cohn on 11/7/2011. (npd)
|
|
Filing
539
ORDER denying 494 Motion for New Trial; denying as moot 499 Motion to Strike. Signed by Judge James I. Cohn on 2/8/2010. (rke)
|
|
Filing
353
ORDER denying 257 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 293 Motion to Strike. Please see Order. Signed by Judge James I. Cohn on 10/8/2009. (rke)
|
|
Filing
343
ORDER denying 252 Defendant Nadeau General Contractors, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 253 Plaintiff Dolores Millette's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Please see order. Signed by Judge James I. Cohn on 10/6/2009. (rke)
|
|
Filing
127
ORDER granting 72 Motion to Dismiss; denying as moot 90 Motion to Dismiss; granting 91 Motion to Dismiss; granting 92 Motion to Dismiss. Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6)of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff failed to state a cause of a ction for federal RICO violations alleged in Counts I - III. Therefore, Counts I, II and III are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Counts IV, V, VI, VII, VIII, IX and X allege state law causes of action for which the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1367(c)(3). These Counts are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. By no later than December 15, 2008, Plaintiff shall respond to Webster Bank's oral argument that her Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint 120 should be denied as futile in light of Green v. RBS Nat. Bank, 288 Fed. Appx. 641 (11th Cir. August 4, 2008).Please see Order for details. Signed by Judge James I. Cohn on 11/25/2008. (lc3)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
