Ramos v. Goodfellas Brooklyn's Finest Pizzeria,LLC et al
| Juan F. Ramos |
| Goodfellas Brooklyn's Finest Pizzeria,LLC and Matthew Brenner |
| 0:2008cv61240 |
| August 4, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Labor: Fair Standards Office |
| Broward |
| William C. Turnoff |
| Marcia G. Cooke |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 29:0206 Collect Unpaid Wages |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
110
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 95 Motion for Attorney Fees; adopting in part re 100 Report and Recommendations.; denying as moot 103 Motion for Hearing; denying as moot 107 Motion for Hearing. Signed by Judge Marcia G. Cooke on 7/16/09. (tm)
|
|
Filing
100
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS Recommending that Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney's Fees be GRANTED in the amount of $31,247.10, representing an award of $27,979.10 in attorney's fees and an award of $3,268.00 in costs. Objections to R&R due by 6/12/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Ted E. Bandstra on 5/26/2009. (rg)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 32 Motion for Summary Judgment and 36 Response and Cross Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Marcia G. Cooke on 2/4/09. (tm)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER denying without prejudice 8 Motion to Dismiss, denying as moot 17 Motion to Stay. Signed by Judge Marcia G. Cooke on 10/15/08. (tm) Modified on 10/16/2008 to add linkage to DE# 17 (wc).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
