Aspex Eyewear, Inc. et al v. Laczay
Plaintiff: Aspex Eyewear, Inc. and Contour Optik, Inc.
Defendant: Levente Tibor Laczay
Case Number: 0:2009cv60488
Filed: April 2, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Office: Patent Office
County: Broward
Presiding Judge: Robin S. Rosenbaum
Presiding Judge: William J. Zloch
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 35:0145 Patent Infringement
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Aspex Eyewear, Inc. et al v. Laczay
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Aspex Eyewear, Inc.
Represented By: Arie Mrejen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Contour Optik, Inc.
Represented By: Arie Mrejen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Levente Tibor Laczay
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?