Emissive Energy Corporation v. Novatac, Inc.
Plaintiff: Emissive Energy Corporation
Defendant: Novatac, Inc.
Case Number: 0:2009mc61215
Filed: August 7, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Office: Ft. Lauderdale Office
County: Broward
Presiding Judge: James I. Cohn
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 0754 Receiver of Property in Different Districts
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 27, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER OVERRULING 14 Non-Party Spa-Simrad, Inc.s Objections to Order Dated August 18, 2009 and DENYING 15 Spa-Simrad, Inc.s Motion to Stay Order and/or Plaintiffs Subpoena Duces Tecum for Deposition. Signed by Judge James I. Cohn on August 27, 2009. (rke)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Emissive Energy Corporation v. Novatac, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Emissive Energy Corporation
Represented By: Loretta Ann Kenna
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Novatac, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?