Figel et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
| Terry Figel and Spencer Figel |
| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Jennifer King, Linda Sims, David M Carroll and Does 1-10 |
| 0:2010cv60737 |
| May 7, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Ft. Lauderdale Office |
| Broward |
| James I. Cohn |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
131
ORDER granting 78 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge James I. Cohn on 3/9/2011. (rke)
|
|
Filing
119
ORDER: the parties may provide briefs on the issue of whether any disputed issues of fact exist regarding whether Defendant breached the Figel Trust no later than Tuesday, March 8, 2011. The parties briefs shall not exceed ten pages in length and shall otherwise comply with the Local Rules regarding formatting. Signed by Judge James I. Cohn on 3/1/2011. (rke)
|
|
Filing
88
ORDER granting 54 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge James I. Cohn on 1/21/2011. (rke)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER granting 27 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiffs may file an amended complaint no later than Friday, November 19, 2010. Signed by Judge James I. Cohn on 11/12/2010. (rke)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 15 Motion to Dismiss. Counts III, IV, and V are dismissed. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint by August 23, 2010. Signed by Judge James I. Cohn on 8/12/2010. (rke)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
