Herrera v. POM WONDERFUL, LLC et al
The maker of POM Wonderful pomegranate juice was sued for allegedly misleading consumers into thinking that drinking eight ounces of its juice each day treats, prevents and reduces the risk of heart disease by claiming to decrease arterial plaque, lower blood pressure, and improve blood flow to the heart.
| Claudia Herrera |
| POM WONDERFUL, LLC, ROLL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION and Publix Super Markets, Inc. |
| 0:2011cv61228 |
| May 27, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Ft. Lauderdale Office |
| Broward |
| Donald L. Graham |
| Property Damage Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 27, 2011. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by POM WONDERFUL, LLC, ROLL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION (Bloom, Amy) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Pendency of Other Action by POM WONDERFUL, LLC, ROLL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION (Bloom, Amy) |
| Filing 2 Judge Assignment to Judge Donald L. Graham (jcy) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL Filing fee $ 350.00 receipt number 113C-3791939, filed by ROLL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, POM WONDERFUL, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Exhibit A - State Court File, # 3 Exhibit B - Consent to Removal by Publix, # 4 Exhibit C - Declaration of Paul Sheppard)(Bloom, Amy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
