Palacios v. Hartman & Tyner, Inc.
Plaintiff: Idania Palacios
Defendant: Hartman & Tyner, Inc.
Case Number: 0:2013cv61541
Filed: July 17, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Office: Ft Lauderdale Office
County: Broward
Presiding Judge: William P. Dimitrouleas
Presiding Judge: Lurana S. Snow
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 0002 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 15, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 84 ORDER granting 71 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom on 12/15/2014. (jua)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Palacios v. Hartman & Tyner, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hartman & Tyner, Inc.
Represented By: Martin P. McDonnell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Idania Palacios
Represented By: Chad Evan Levy
Represented By: Christopher John Whitelock
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?