Mursten v. Caporella
Plaintiff: David B. Mursten
Defendant: Nick A. Caporella
Case Number: 0:2014cv60014
Filed: January 3, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Office: Ft Lauderdale Office
County: Broward
Presiding Judge: James I. Cohn
Presiding Judge: Barry S. Seltzer
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 2, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 171 ORDER granting 92 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment; denying as moot 132 Defendant's Motion to Strike Declaration of Michael Mursten and 138 Defendant's Corrected Motion to Strike Declaration of David B. Mursten. Signed by Judge James I. Cohn on 10/2/2014. (ns)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mursten v. Caporella
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David B. Mursten
Represented By: Paul Joseph Schwiep
Represented By: Jeffrey Bruce Crockett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nick A. Caporella
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?