Roor v. SMOKE THIS TOO, LLC
Plaintiff: Roor
Defendant: SMOKE THIS TOO, LLC
Case Number: 0:2016cv61439
Filed: June 24, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Office: Ft Lauderdale Office
County: Broward (Office: Ft Lauderdale)
Presiding Judge: Beth Bloom
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 0001 Antitrust Litigation
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 14, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 80 ORDER ON DEFENDANTS MOTION TO TAX COSTS AND MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES.ORDER denying 73 Motion to Tax Costs. ; denying 74 Motion for Bill of Costs; denying 78 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom on 7/14/2017. (lbc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Roor v. SMOKE THIS TOO, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Roor
Represented By: Anthony Joseph Badway
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SMOKE THIS TOO, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?