Tapp v. Scandinavian Micro Systems, Inc.

Plaintiff: Ronald Tapp
Defendant: Scandinavian Micro Systems, Inc.
Case Number: 0:2017cv61592
Filed: August 9, 2017
Court: Florida Southern District Court
Office: Ft Lauderdale Office
County: Broward (Office: Ft Lauderdale)
Presiding Judge: Ursula Ungaro
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 29:0201
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 27, 2017 21 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER Approving Settlement Agreement and Recommending That the Case Be Dismissed with Prejudice re 1 Complaint filed by Ronald Tapp.(Objections to R&R due by 10/11/2017). Signed by Magistrate Judge John J. O'Sullivan on 9/27/2017. (mms)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tapp v. Scandinavian Micro Systems, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ronald Tapp
Represented By: Angeli Murthy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Scandinavian Micro Systems, Inc.
Represented By: Thomas Holland Loffredo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?