Cohan v. The Fresh Market, Inc.
| Howard Cohan |
| The Fresh Market, Inc. and The Fresh Market, Inc. a Foreign Profit Corporation doing business as The Fresh Market |
| 0:2017cv62440 |
| December 12, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Ft Lauderdale Office |
| Broward (Office: Ft Lauderdale) |
| Beth Bloom |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
ORDER OF DISMISSAL with Prejudice, the Clerk is directed to CLOSE this case. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom on 3/30/2018. (mno)
|
|
Filing 16
Administrative Order Closing Case. All pending deadlines are TERMINATED. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom on 2/27/2018. (lk) NOTICE: If there are sealed documents in this case, they may be unsealed after 1 year or as directed by Court Order, unless they have been designated to be permanently sealed. See Local Rule 5.4 and Administrative Order 2014-69.
|
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Settlement by Howard Cohan (Sconzo, Gregory) |
|
Filing 14
Order directing parties to comply with the Order Requiring Joint Scheduling Report. -Joint Scheduling Report due by 2/26/2018 Signed by Judge Beth Bloom on 2/21/2018. (lk)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER in actions brought under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom on 2/13/2018. (lk)
|
| Filing 12 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint by The Fresh Market, Inc.. (Blair, Brian) |
|
Filing 11
Order Requiring Joint Scheduling Report. -Joint Scheduling Report due by 2/20/2018. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom on 1/30/2018. (lk)
|
|
Filing 10
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Answer to Complaint by The Fresh Market, Inc. by 2/13/2017. Re: #1 Complaint filed by Howard Cohan. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom (BB)
|
| Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint by The Fresh Market, Inc.. (Blair, Brian) |
| Filing 8 Certificate of Interested Parties/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by The Fresh Market, Inc. (Blair, Brian) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline by Howard Cohan. The Fresh Market, Inc. served on 1/9/2017, answer due 1/30/2017. (Sconzo, Gregory) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER TO SERVE. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom on 1/11/2018. (kpe)
|
| Filing 5 RESPONSE to #4 Order, Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings by Howard Cohan. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Sconzo, Gregory) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER requiring verified certificate of counsel regarding any prior filings under the Americans with Disabilities Act. ( Responses due by 1/2/2018) Signed by Judge Beth Bloom on 12/12/2017. (lk)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to The Fresh Market, Inc.. (yha) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Beth Bloom. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia O. Valle is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (yha) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against The Fresh Market, Inc.. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-10251164, filed by Howard Cohan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Sconzo, Gregory) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
