Gregory Haskin Chiropractic Clinics, Inc. v. Windhaven Insurance Company
Plaintiff: Gregory Haskin Chiropractic Clinics, Inc.
Defendant: Windhaven Insurance Company
Case Number: 0:2017cv62532
Filed: December 21, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Office: Ft Lauderdale Office
County: Broward (Office: Ft Lauderdale)
Presiding Judge: William P. Dimitrouleas
Presiding Judge: Lurana S. Snow
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gregory Haskin Chiropractic Clinics, Inc. v. Windhaven Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gregory Haskin Chiropractic Clinics, Inc.
Represented By: Tod N. Aronovitz
Represented By: Barbara Perez
Represented By: Theophilos George Poulopoulos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Windhaven Insurance Company
Represented By: Marcy Levine Aldrich
Represented By: Ari Gerstin
Represented By: Ross Elliot Linzer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?