Sream, Inc. et al v. Mishu Akhter Corporation
Plaintiff: Roor International BV and Sream, Inc.
Defendant: Mishu Akhter Corporation
Case Number: 0:2018cv61424
Filed: June 25, 2018
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Office: Ft Lauderdale Office
County: Broward (Office: Ft Lauderdale)
Presiding Judge: Beth Bloom
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 20, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 20, 2018 Filing 10 FORM AO 120 SENT TO DIRECTOR OF U.S. PATENT AND TRADEMARK (Attachments: #1 Final Order of Dismissal) (ls)
August 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 9 FINAL ORDER of DISMISSAL re #8 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal; Dismissing Case with prejudice; Closing Case. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom on 8/20/2018. See attached document for full details. (ls)
August 17, 2018 Filing 8 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice by Roor International BV, Sream, Inc. (Sasson, Jamie)
August 16, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER Requiring Plaintiff to File Motion for Entry of Clerk's Default by 8/20/2018. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom on 8/16/2018. See attached document for full details. (ls)
July 31, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER, Mishu Akhter Corporation response due 8/7/2018.. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom on 7/31/2018. See attached document for full details. (yha)
July 11, 2018 Filing 5 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline by Sream, Inc., Roor International BV. Mishu Akhter Corporation served on 7/9/2018, answer due 7/30/2018. (Sasson, Jamie)
June 26, 2018 Filing 4 FORM AO 120 SENT TO DIRECTOR OF U.S. PATENT AND TRADEMARK (yha)
June 26, 2018 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Mishu Akhter Corporation. (yha)
June 25, 2018 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Beth Bloom. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia O. Valle is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (yha)
June 25, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Mishu Akhter Corporation d/b/a Kwik Stop. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-10763455, filed by Sream, Inc., Roor International BV. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Summon(s), #8 Civil Cover Sheet)(Sasson, Jamie)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sream, Inc. et al v. Mishu Akhter Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Roor International BV
Represented By: Jamie Alan Sasson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sream, Inc.
Represented By: Jamie Alan Sasson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mishu Akhter Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?